Nber Working Paper Series Premium Transparency in the Medicare Advantage Market: Implications for Premiums, Benefits, and Efficiency
نویسندگان
چکیده
In the Medicare Advantage (MA) market, private health insurers compete to offer plans with the most attractive premium and benefit package. Medicare provides a subsidy, based on a \benchmark payment rate", for each Medicare beneficiary a plan enrolls. We investigate how this subsidy, the primary policy lever in the market, affects the equilibrium premiums and benefits of MA plans. We exploit variation in benchmark payment rates within plans over time, coming from rebasing years where benchmark changes differed across areas in ways that were plausibly exogenous, to determine empirically how plan premiums and benefit generosity respond to changes in benchmarks. We find that premiums do not respond to changes in the benchmark payment rate on average but that insurers do pass through a portion of the benchmark increase by increasing plan benefit generosity. We argue that the way premium information is communicated to consumers influences the way in which plans pass through subsidy dollars and can account for the empirical results. More specifically, institutional features make it difficult for consumers to observe a large component of the plan premium, leading to a lack of demand response to premium reductions below the premium charged by traditional Medicare (the fee-for-service Part B premium). When demand does not respond to lower premiums, plans have an incentive to pass-through cost subsidies to consumers via more generous benefits that consumers may not value at cost, creating an inefficiently high level of benefit generosity. Our results provide evidence that a lack of premium transparency in the MA market may distort the combination of premium levels and benefit generosity offered in equilibrium, resulting in some degree of inefficiently high benefits. We conclude by discussing changes to the choice environment that would increase premium transparency and potentially soften the premium rigidities we find. Karen Stockley Department of Economics Harvard University [email protected] Thomas McGuire Department of Health Care Policy Harvard Medical School 180 Longwood Avenue Boston, MA 02115 and NBER [email protected] Christopher Afendulis Department of Health Care Policy Harvard Medical School 180 Longwood Avenue Boston, MA 02115 [email protected] Michael E. Chernew Harvard Medical School Dept. of Health Care Policy 180 Longwood Avenue Boston, MA 02115 and NBER [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Does Privatized Health Insurance Benefit Patients or Producers? Evidence from Medicare Advantage∗
A central question in the debate over privatized Medicare is whether increased government payments to private Medicare Advantage (MA) plans generate lower premiums for consumers or higher profits for producers. Using difference-in-differences variation brought about by a sharp legislative change, we find that MA insurers pass through 44% of increased payments in lower premiums and an additional...
متن کاملNber Working Paper Series Paying a Premium on Your Premium? Consolidation in the U.s. Health Insurance Industry
We examine whether and to what extent consolidation in the U.S. health insurance industry is leading to higher employer-sponsored insurance premiums. We make use of a proprietary, panel dataset of employer-sponsored healthplans enrolling over 10 million Americans annually between 1998 and 2006 to explore the relationship between premium growth and changes in market concentration. We exploit the...
متن کاملPremium Rebates and the Quiet Consensus on Market Reform for Medicare
Premium rebates allow beneficiaries who choose more efficient Medicare options to receive cash rebates, rather than extra benefits. That simple idea has been controversial. Without fanfare, however, premium rebates have become a key area of agreement in the debate on Medicare reform. Moreover, in legislation in late 2000, it became official policy: Medicare+Choice (M+C) plans will be allowed to...
متن کاملQuality Ratings and Premiums in the Medicare Advantage Market
We examine the response of Medicare Advantage contracts to published quality ratings. We identify the effect of star ratings on premiums using a regression discontinuity design that exploits plausibly random variation around rating thresholds. We find that 3, 3.5, and 4-star contracts in 2009 significantly increased their 2010 monthly premiums by $20 or more relative to contracts just below the...
متن کاملSupply-side Responses to Public Quality Ratings: Evidence from Medicare Advantage
Since 2009, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has distributed quality star ratings for Medicare Advantage (MA) contracts to better inform Medicare eligible individuals of MA plan quality. This paper examines the extent to which the quality star rating scheme affected insurer behavior in the MA market. We identify the causal effect of 2009 star ratings on 2010 MA premiums usin...
متن کامل